• Users Online: 262
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
EDITORIAL
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 1-2

Archie Cochrane: The Pioneer of Fourth Revolution of Health Care


Editor-in-Chief, Journal of Dental and Allied Sciences, Sinhgad Dental College and Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India

Date of Web Publication19-Oct-2015

Correspondence Address:
Jayant N Palaskar
Professor and Head, Department of Prosthodontics, Sinhgad Dental College and Hospital, Pune - 411041, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2277-4696.167511

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Palaskar JN. Archie Cochrane: The Pioneer of Fourth Revolution of Health Care. J Dent Allied Sci 2015;4:1-2

How to cite this URL:
Palaskar JN. Archie Cochrane: The Pioneer of Fourth Revolution of Health Care. J Dent Allied Sci [serial online] 2015 [cited 2019 Jun 15];4:1-2. Available from: http://www.jdas.in/text.asp?2015/4/1/1/167511

The objective of this editorial is to increase the awareness of systematic reviews and meta-analysis among dental surgeons and also about Archie Cochrane and his accomplishments.

The systematic review focuses on a research question and reviews all high-quality evidence relevant to that question to make informed decisions in health care. When such reviews analyze statistical data from relevant articles, it is known as meta-analysis. Meta-analysis and systematic reviews are the gold standard of evidence based medicine/dentistry as they lie at the top of the pyramid that constitutes levels of studies for the strength of evidence. The Cochrane system of systematic analysis is widely acknowledged as benchmark amongst all the review systems. Cochrane reviews are systematic assessments of evidence of the effects of healthcare interventions, intended to help people to make informed decisions about health care, their own or someone else's. [1] Cochrane reviews are needed to help ensure that healthcare decisions throughout the world can be informed by high quality, timely research evidence. [1] This system is named after Dr. Archibald (Archie) Leman Cochrane (1909-1988), a British Researcher, a revolutionary and visionary physician.

He was the first one in the field of medical sciences to understand the need of a systematic analysis of the abundant scientific data available and to use it in clinical practice. Cochrane stated that "It is surely a great criticism of our profession that we have not organized a critical summary, by specialty or subspecialty, adapted periodically, of all relevant randomized control trials (RCTs)." [2] Cochrane promoted the RCTs and his call for an organized database of RCTs served as a momentum for the formation of the Cochrane Collaboration in 1993 under the leadership of Iain Chalmers. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews is regularly updated and maintained by the Cochrane Collaboration, an organization at the forefront of the evidence based medicine/dentistry revolution.

Archibald Cochrane's most influential mark on healthcare was his 1971 publication, "Effectiveness and Efficiency: Random Reflections on Health Services." This book strongly criticized the lack of reliable evidence behind many of the commonly accepted healthcare interventions at the time. [3] His criticisms spurred rigorous evaluations of healthcare interventions and highlighted the need for evidence in medicine. [3] This book advocated the use of RCTs to make medicine more effective and efficient. [4] Cochrane's book was unique because it used an amalgamation of studies to show that the problem of evidence plagued not just one aspect of medicine but was pervasive. [3] For example, at the time of the book's publication, tonsillectomies were among the commonest cause of admission of children to the hospital. Cochrane suggested that the operation was too often performed without any indication. [3] At the same time, Cochrane showed that in contrast to the vast amount of tonsillectomies performed by doctors, hearing problems of the elderly were largely ignored by doctors. [3] By giving multiple examples, he could convince that many treatment modalities were being practiced without sound scientific evidence. According to a review of his book in the British Medical Journal, "the hero of the book is the RCT, and the villains are the clinicians in the "care" part of the National Health Service (NHS) who either fail to carry out such trials or succeed in ignoring the results if they do not fit in with their own preconceived ideas." [5]

The search for quality evidence can be difficult and time-consuming, it is further complicated because of increased number of publications and multiple studies concluding contradictory results leading to confusion in deciding final treatment interventions. These problems can be addressed by resorting to systematic reviews, which unlike traditional reviews, adhere to reproducible methods and recommended guidelines. [6]

This movement toward using current evidence to guide medical decisions can be referred to as the "fourth revolution" of health care; the first three being the introduction of health insurance, the backlash of payers to reduce costs, and outcomes-based research. [7],[8] Sir William Osler once noted, "The practice of medicine is an art, based on science. Medicine is a science of uncertainty and an art of probability." [9] The uncertainties of medicine remain prevalent today in spite of great advances in research and technology. It is the sensible use of the best available external evidence from systematic research assimilated with the individual clinical expertise to evaluate the best course of care for a patient. [10] Cochrane believed that the ultimate duty of medical doctors was to make decisions between alternative therapies based on cost/benefit comparisons. [3] However, even he realized that RCTs did not always provide an explicit answer when different RCTs provide contradictory results. [3] Cochrane realized that clinicians would not find a series of RCTs helpful and would not necessarily know which trial was the best. [3] By conducting a systematic review of RCTs, the reviewers try to eliminate bias (if any) during their review and able to suggest conclusive clinical interventions.

What was said by Cochrane in 1971 for physicians holds true for dental surgeons, who are trying to successfully juggle their role as researchers and clinicians. It is high time that dental fraternity embraces the systematic review approach to evidence-based dentistry (EBD) to offer optimum care, minimize treatment cost, improve efficiency and provide predictable results. Thus, systematic review and meta-analysis shall increasingly play a pivotal role to solidify the scientific foundation of dentistry in general and to help reduce uncertainties in dental decision-making.

 
  References Top

1.
Systematic Reviews and The Cochrane Collaboration. Available from: [Last accessed on 2015 Sep 28].  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Cochrane A. 1931-1971: A critical review, with particular reference to the medical profession. Medicines for the Year 2000. London: Office of Health Economics; 1979. p. 1-11.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Shah HM, Chung KC. Archie cochrane and his vision for evidence-based medicine. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;124:982-8.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Keehan S, Sisko A, Truffer C, Smith S, Cowan C, Poisal J, et al. Health spending projections through 2017: The baby-boom generation is coming to medicare. Health Aff (Millwood) 2008;27:w145-55.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Dollery CT. Constructive attack. Effectiveness and efficiency. Random reflections on health services (AL Cochrane). Book reviews. Br Med J 1972;56.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Margaliot Z, Chung KC. Systematic reviews: A primer for plastic surgery research. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;120:1834-41.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Chung KC, Ram AN. Evidence-based medicine: The fourth revolution in American medicine? Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;123:389-98.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Relman AS. Assessment and accountability: The third revolution in medical care. N Engl J Med 1988;319:1220-2.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.
Osler W, Silverman ME, Murray TJ, Bryan CS. The Quotable Osler. Philadelphia: American College of Physicians, American Society of Internal Medicine; 2003:204.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn′t. BMJ 1996;312:71-2.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]    

 
  Authors Top


Jayant N. Palaskar




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
References
Authors

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed873    
    Printed15    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded124    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]